Information on Result #506529

There is no (69, 169, 3110)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 425 599873 131575 455512 845970 399484 699002 563806 446575 811689 287651 092570 167427 221451 897058 306866 639828 700517 474517 077265 655826 421281 584670 039934 844200 218496 > 8169

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (69, 170, 3110)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction