Information on Result #506537
There is no (85, 169, 10126)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 419 244674 001640 858136 384909 838962 955145 886928 679096 798938 426534 307139 398142 800016 700937 712574 016069 012147 637151 173477 025130 981113 201280 450583 647732 707544 > 8169
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (85, 170, 10126)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |