Information on Result #506547
There is no (105, 169, 107435)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 419 012264 205150 749760 299056 247867 142928 420711 618443 092851 556414 641674 110365 010393 418594 713382 547343 823607 484305 812024 413499 642395 244021 928005 141829 075905 > 8169
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (105, 170, 107435)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction |