Information on Result #506564
There is no (44, 170, 910)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3358 093947 363236 516325 689996 105109 351706 240697 466660 549745 931551 085925 622770 570716 592992 728499 933530 521421 121856 242254 645090 220803 141753 788751 267170 630976 > 8170
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (44, 171, 910)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction |