Information on Result #506567

There is no (50, 170, 1162)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3390 730012 360696 988203 123869 339602 208693 530668 849249 386897 879904 380888 476593 803130 205193 488531 681063 173054 361351 404228 008652 189603 100303 715908 563572 062432 > 8170

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (50, 171, 1162)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction