Information on Result #506585

There is no (86, 170, 10642)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3363 151147 499530 867886 216925 292974 378268 360806 345871 998699 889764 472136 242393 364178 439435 835301 720666 835705 675439 858186 420272 331516 627237 932467 502675 448160 > 8170

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (86, 171, 10642)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction