Information on Result #506588
There is no (92, 170, 18981)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3354 178616 230148 848802 480790 487431 016327 434518 073377 454565 834376 840844 324791 519380 857549 393009 193054 641944 736033 930963 483794 525382 321229 871177 272358 736896 > 8170
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (92, 171, 18981)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |