Information on Result #506595
There is no (106, 170, 114650)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3352 494389 978780 729363 455970 540146 835913 681880 813007 287203 647989 566518 435370 465150 176705 332883 202170 521717 001528 634049 510691 966222 957524 933583 532423 197238 > 8170
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (106, 171, 114650)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction |