Information on Result #506607

There is no (33, 171, 613)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 27835 297954 585646 858983 149595 781152 895101 877401 163227 972746 073397 953628 908569 956167 617394 341624 366594 604127 693427 109529 321241 202339 776156 200410 378464 126584 > 8171

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (33, 172, 613)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction