Information on Result #506613
There is no (45, 171, 942)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 27129 883916 104445 471741 211261 262756 144366 667838 133217 717214 469970 708181 748054 277857 920562 470540 342906 751258 006359 891795 399873 726347 900738 880397 826337 328064 > 8171
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (45, 172, 942)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |