Information on Result #506616
There is no (51, 171, 1205)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 28064 832316 080182 548996 622351 470319 210496 860888 135887 856563 287484 790794 746250 774481 675272 478629 378770 288671 073488 196587 023587 284595 968889 634372 891078 632688 > 8171
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (51, 172, 1205)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |