Information on Result #506617
There is no (53, 171, 1314)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 26894 722931 799244 891132 600973 537049 491103 393029 536859 878118 739003 507347 026695 453715 215131 282084 808711 946317 141397 558256 289451 406669 174617 627673 725666 909312 > 8171
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (53, 172, 1314)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction |