Information on Result #506622
There is no (63, 171, 2135)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 26949 493199 385708 873757 986156 600344 995589 948150 131418 676665 079436 821470 413558 738208 401999 811032 028636 465513 823066 179084 184250 930509 239352 210718 019670 495554 > 8171
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (63, 172, 2135)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |