Information on Result #506625
There is no (69, 171, 2994)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 27226 969285 278870 938198 404061 715144 477369 331762 053364 541321 798188 663281 399534 980526 979743 213915 798396 434696 225547 525460 351553 608510 136911 258965 333926 086784 > 8171
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (69, 172, 2994)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction |