Information on Result #506635
There is no (89, 171, 13444)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 26819 662200 317660 913073 249926 414395 531798 571454 366263 089134 465480 346191 852085 434733 459779 272990 251216 247691 592912 997255 045082 948553 492645 532889 791604 462960 > 8171
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (89, 172, 13444)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |