Information on Result #506645
There is no (109, 171, 169999)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 26815 960038 192996 335705 297769 828083 396012 948854 639431 282137 904931 839014 723866 946571 000007 427036 341413 289572 686693 054910 363822 844673 432194 814304 800447 581184 > 8171
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (109, 172, 169999)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |