Information on Result #506666

There is no (56, 172, 1492)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 214903 357148 290732 345969 958679 755087 428382 229865 209621 462548 882467 452029 845394 575088 096981 961269 640700 901572 485854 846430 488768 065582 633514 344854 261482 415304 > 8172

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (56, 173, 1492)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction