Information on Result #506688

There is no (100, 172, 42090)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 214705 322000 415559 870461 789940 300194 459435 882686 188641 904689 748628 448265 631147 752277 926715 757494 810369 778939 049414 952665 203184 583282 980752 635798 674560 837018 > 8172

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (100, 173, 42090)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction