Information on Result #506898

There is no (9, 31, 294)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 385892 545231 794186 116873 667025 > 931

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (9, 32, 294)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction