Information on Result #507121

There is no (33, 49, 329102)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 57265 235543 052856 242521 063426 387007 917065 241217 > 949

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (33, 50, 329102)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction