Information on Result #507148

There is no (29, 51, 16292)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 4 638966 924859 127211 870356 967463 083270 736682 753505 > 951

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (29, 52, 16292)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction