Information on Result #507160
There is no (22, 52, 1624)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 42 080949 442602 191792 631501 935027 917605 223548 015681 > 952
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (22, 53, 1624)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |