Information on Result #507163

There is no (28, 52, 9016)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 41 778552 891098 995849 908887 999845 327769 797680 378625 > 952

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (28, 53, 9016)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction