Information on Result #507166

There is no (34, 52, 169064)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 41 747030 966683 317299 030935 005464 789249 947439 673665 > 952

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (34, 53, 169064)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction