Information on Result #507303

There is no (17, 61, 488)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 16459 948385 856739 577925 620189 604405 634642 653798 223042 343553 > 961

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (17, 62, 488)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction