Information on Result #507359

There is no (22, 64, 866)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 11 908527 939324 587359 110393 442944 201983 181853 304262 607276 256721 > 964

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (22, 65, 866)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction