Information on Result #507381

There is no (29, 65, 2626)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 106 777725 597099 662814 409622 272920 021373 306712 459314 843255 447521 > 965

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (29, 66, 2626)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction