Information on Result #507383

There is no (33, 65, 6389)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 106 185770 276379 289958 344649 152452 929486 781076 121317 956991 814785 > 965

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (33, 66, 6389)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction