Information on Result #507396

There is no (22, 66, 812)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 957 990561 024328 387498 760029 239631 497207 162157 485520 007743 795905 > 966

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (22, 67, 812)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction