Information on Result #507418

There is no (27, 67, 1621)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 8615 054576 024208 706775 373532 729895 292249 336141 930921 330225 199521 > 967

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (27, 68, 1621)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction