Information on Result #507479

There is no (32, 70, 3238)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 6 277424 778146 647147 664603 484077 959145 704557 903712 280279 003403 116625 > 970

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (32, 71, 3238)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction