Information on Result #507498

There is no (31, 71, 2522)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 56 461031 592536 877915 030328 832413 948484 883789 925065 607479 853699 279041 > 971

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (31, 72, 2522)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction