Information on Result #507692
There is no (32, 80, 1844)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 21936 469650 934901 986427 562128 646445 524634 849180 734821 486135 677218 566270 316801 > 980
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (32, 81, 1844)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |