Information on Result #507697

There is no (42, 80, 10316)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 21848 473869 527325 768058 298848 269457 665815 505241 592268 042237 418365 790084 785057 > 980

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (42, 81, 10316)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction