Information on Result #507709

There is no (21, 81, 550)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 200120 149281 101313 596319 248830 861754 831064 263838 986416 869769 547152 132812 942177 > 981

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (21, 82, 550)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction