Information on Result #507757

There is no (23, 83, 640)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 16 513178 243239 878732 540764 752327 977708 330022 300690 790344 102405 356123 504513 665025 > 983

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (23, 84, 640)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction