Information on Result #507844
There is no (54, 86, 114411)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 11611 321314 268101 048902 320319 834221 888174 647448 338282 555314 223590 617685 856578 048385 > 986
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (54, 87, 114411)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction |