Information on Result #507844

There is no (54, 86, 114411)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 11611 321314 268101 048902 320319 834221 888174 647448 338282 555314 223590 617685 856578 048385 > 986

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (54, 87, 114411)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction