Information on Result #507852

There is no (21, 87, 520)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 107102 957529 849467 582531 277272 602958 986364 488721 507582 607763 183709 265334 110026 115137 > 987

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (21, 88, 520)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction