Information on Result #507908

There is no (31, 89, 1221)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 8 661125 314228 048217 908480 532781 471386 203761 986794 405834 535511 077960 389481 510964 574473 > 989

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (31, 90, 1221)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction