Information on Result #507936

There is no (34, 90, 1632)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 76 590532 372053 031796 531033 003516 284783 516275 349224 793043 718702 129875 456790 585055 333377 > 990

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (34, 91, 1632)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction