Information on Result #507986
There is no (32, 92, 1253)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 6239 901764 848696 781646 937959 243014 585901 713303 622883 485092 341380 137121 464169 057876 466161 > 992
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (32, 93, 1253)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |