Information on Result #508014
There is no (35, 93, 1659)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 56402 981638 270851 541879 514454 649817 919315 439415 212861 050983 220626 316837 780758 562610 949753 > 993
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (35, 94, 1659)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction |