Information on Result #508014

There is no (35, 93, 1659)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 56402 981638 270851 541879 514454 649817 919315 439415 212861 050983 220626 316837 780758 562610 949753 > 993

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (35, 94, 1659)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction