Information on Result #508039
There is no (32, 94, 1196)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 501523 943433 717317 316786 368447 272477 528948 200383 457080 798716 265535 088255 095745 621177 359905 > 994
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (32, 95, 1196)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |