Information on Result #508069
There is no (37, 95, 1933)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 4 547857 331807 728669 647702 423537 773081 716668 132425 626091 951890 482900 611526 307489 759751 954505 > 995
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (37, 96, 1933)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction |