Information on Result #508069

There is no (37, 95, 1933)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 4 547857 331807 728669 647702 423537 773081 716668 132425 626091 951890 482900 611526 307489 759751 954505 > 995

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (37, 96, 1933)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction