Information on Result #508071

There is no (41, 95, 3095)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 4 529645 213972 679961 166956 439228 805462 227487 444014 792001 498926 266282 598214 191568 190662 256233 > 995

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (41, 96, 3095)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction