Information on Result #508104
There is no (52, 96, 16497)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 40 531396 338381 228770 934104 633606 749709 513972 036748 172365 218676 366613 920280 035903 435977 983345 > 996
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (52, 97, 16497)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |