Information on Result #508116

There is no (21, 97, 490)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 381 596835 119860 946045 555808 970249 730974 990639 135454 991385 239762 548298 512483 846583 503756 282913 > 997

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (21, 98, 490)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction