Information on Result #508159
There is no (52, 98, 13704)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 3282 234181 966894 509017 556600 650165 866193 285229 176074 029425 115563 388210 076426 103673 328072 523457 > 998
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (52, 99, 13704)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction |