Information on Result #508169

There is no (17, 99, 382)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 30313 014130 212482 971221 277537 430913 735334 068574 724154 251817 986563 047806 507964 769971 799293 523569 > 999

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (17, 100, 382)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction