Information on Result #508256

There is no (20, 102, 453)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 22 351210 681057 459008 667359 022596 328095 572822 329925 112079 507091 555415 397676 482141 160480 577445 789545 > 9102

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (20, 103, 453)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction